Mediating Homeschooling Issues

I met with a homeschooling family to resolve their custody, visitation and support disputes. Previously, the parents met with other attorneys and mediators who did not approve of or understand homeschooling and who made the problems between the parents worse. 

 An attorney convinced the father that the children needed to be put in public school despite his support of homeschooling and ten years of successfully homeschooling their academically gifted children together. That attorney told the father that because the children would spend more time with the mother, who was the primary homeschooling and stay-at-home parent, they would bond more closely with her, she would be unable to work, and he would have to pay higher child support. The mother’s attorney said the courts would not approve of homeschooling and there was no alternative except to send the children to public school. The custody evaluator told the parents that he was going to recommend public school because the children needed socialization. 

After being unable to reach an agreement, these parents were referred to me. As a mediator with homeschooling experience, I was able to spend a day with them to explore homeschooling issues and solutions. We discussed the underlying issues, fears, and needs of both parents and children. We discovered that both parents were happy with homeschooling. Moreover, their children desperately wanted to continue homeschooling in order to stay in their homeschooling community.

The parents found solutions that helped both of them have a flexible schedule and gave them each more time with their children than would be possible if the children attended public or private school. Under their plan, both parents became active participants in their children’s homeschooling. This plan gave the father more time with the children and more responsibility for the children’s education. It enabled the mother to pursue her dream career and help with the family finances. The parents left the mediation session as parenting partners and with the tools to help them resolve future conflicts. 

My experience as a homeschooling parent of grown homeschoolers helped me facilitate a mediation session that helped these parents discover the solutions they needed. They found a mutually agreeable result that met their underlying interests. They focused on preserving their relationship and their children’s best interests, rather than "winning," because they realized in litigation there are no winners. They both won under the plan they developed together.

 If you are interested in more information, please check out my website at www.lindajconrad.com and feel free to contact me.

Why Mediation?

Yesterday, I was asked why I mediate when I enjoy the law so much. Easy, it's because there is great satisfaction in helping people in crisis find solutions that also help to preserve business, family and social relationships or help litigants find peace. The real question is why I waited so long to begin.

My mediation practice should have begun in 1963, when I was in Mrs. Asher's fifth grade class at Calabash Street Elementary School in Woodland Hills, California. I was asked by my friends to solve their argument. I suggested they talk to each other with me. They did, and the next time I saw them, they were the best of friends. This, and supporting many friends through many crisis during the tumultuous 60s and 70s, should have directed me towards mediation. But in the 70s, there were no formal mediation studies. 

Instead, I discovered political science in college and was among the first big wave of women to go to law school in the 70s with the idea that the law could help change lives. There were no classes on mediation or settlement theory, so I studied a classical legal curriculum, wrote for the law review, and learned how to write legal briefs and be a litigator. For the next 30 years, I advised, litigated and handled appeals involving issues as diverse as injury and insurance law, construction defects, products liability, multiparty litigation, business planning and disputes, non-profit law, and family issues. The law is many things, and knowing the law helps resolve many disputes, but it is not always fair, does not solve all disputes, and often neither party is happy with the result or the costs of litigation.

When two of my colleagues suggested mediation training, I was skeptical. I was busy with a thriving appellate practice and four children in high school, college and law school. Yet, after my first day of appellate mediation training with Dana Curtis Mediation (danacurtismediation.com) I knew I wanted to be a mediator. Since training, researching, and working as a mediator, I've seen how mediation has the power to resolve disputes, save relationships, and help people find peace.

That is why I mediate.

California's Third District Presiding Justice Vance Raye's Law Day Speech-Honoring John Adams

I just returned to my office after listening to a speech by Justice Vance Raye who is the Presiding Justice of the California Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District. The speech was given for the Yolo County Bar Association Law Day Celebration and it was on the national law day topic, "Celebrating the Legacy of John Adams." The celebration was wonderful with awards ranging from a "John Adams look-alike contest" to the non-lawyer community member who has contributed the most to justice within the community. Another highlight was the knowledge that all proceeds from the celebration were going to the Yolo County Food Bank and Meals on Wheels.

But what impressed me the most was hearing Justice Raye talk about the often unsung heroes of our legal community who, like John Adams, represent folks who no one else will represent because their causes are unpopular. As president of California Appellate Defense Counsel, my colleagues and I are often discouraged by the lack of respect we perceive when we represent indigent persons who have been convicted of crimes or lost their children at the trial level. With Justice Raye's acknowledgment that his heroes included, among others, an attorney who represented unpopular causes involving defendants that no one else would represent, it validated the reason that so many of us went to law school--to help people less fortunate than ourselves achieve justice.

Thank you Justice Raye for highlighting once again that our legal system is first and foremost about justice for all of us, even those of us who do not have power or money. If the justice system does not serve the people who need it most, then it does not serve us all. Congratulations to the Yolo County Bar Association for  making this celebration possible.

http://lindajconrad.com/

Follow my tweets here!

Confidentiality of mediation proceedings affirmed by California Supreme Court

Today, in Cassel v. Superior Court, the California Supreme Court reaffirmed and strengthened the confidentiality of all things spoken or written in connection with mediation proceedings. This confidentiality means that all things said and done during and in preparation for mediation may not be discovered or admitted in any noncriminal proceeding, including civil trials, administrative proceedings or arbitrations. (Cassel v. Superior Court (January 13, 2011 S178914).) As the Supreme Court wrote, candor is "necessary to a successful mediation." It encourages the parties to be honest and open with each other in the interest of resolving their disputes without worrying that anything they say or do during or in preparation for mediation will result in prejudicial use of the information by the other party.

For instance, in one of my mediations, "John" and "Sam" were involved in a dispute that was destroying their long-standing personal and business relationship. After an intense and emotionally demanding day-long mediation, where John was able to candidly tell Sam how the dispute was affecting him and Sam was able to honestly tell John why he took certain actions, the final and crucial factor that made settlement possible was a simple apology.

"I'm sorry," said Sam. And the case settled.

An apology is impossible if it can be used later to imply guilt and responsibility. But full disclosure by the parties culminating in an apology during mediation can settle a dispute as well as, like it did here, reaffirm a business association and reconcile a personal relationship. Cassel v. Superior Court is one of the long line of cases in California that makes successful resolution of disputes and preservation of relationships possible.